2.1 Identifying the Geodesign problem

[hls]https://practical-geodesignhub.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/2.1%20Identifying%20Geodesign%20problem%20to%20work%20on-4k/master.m3u8[/hls]

Here are some key points:

  • Negotiations in routine situations embody existing power structures.
  • Introducing digital technology can dissolve these structures, leading to new outcomes.

When should you consider using Geodesignhub?

  • Coordinating stakeholders
  • Agreeing on priorities
  • Contested site(s)
  • Conflicting politics
  • Negotiated settlements

[hls]https://practical-geodesignhub.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/2.1%20Spatially%20explicit%20vs%20non-explicit-4k/master.m3u8[/hls]

Additional scenarios for using Geodesign Hub include:

  • Single or multi-issue disputes
  • Diverse stakeholders
  • Two- or multi-party conflicts
  • Parties willing but stuck
  • Preventive interventions
  • Last-ditch efforts to avoid costly processes like litigation

In identifying a geodesign problem to work on, Geodesign Hub has been used in projects involving coordination of stakeholders and agreeing on priorities. Here are some insights from the presentation:

  • The tool is used in resolving conflicts between different stakeholders in contested sites.
  • Negotiations are carried out live between stakeholders using meaningful engagement platforms.
  • Geodesign is utilized in multi-party conflicts and single or multi-issue disputes.
  • It helps in scenarios where parties are willing but unable to move forward without decisions impacting many.

Overall, the integration of digital negotiation technologies in geodesign can dissolve existing power structures, leading to new outcomes. The negotiation process in geodesign revolves around defining a study area, a project boundary, a clear problem statement, and utilizing digital data and processes.

group-decision-making.pdf (1.2 MB)
← 1.3 Geodesign negotiations and problem-solving - 2.2 Formulating goals and constraints for negotiation →